From the Labor Council

Join the North Shore Labor Council for their 2008 Campaign Fun(d) Raiser with Presidential Candidate Jimmy Tingle!

Obama Project Labor Order Implemented Today

 

     

During his first month in office, President Obama issued an executive order [1] encouraging agencies to require the use of project labor agreements (PLAs) on large-scale construction projects. Today, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR) issued the final rule that implements the order.

Says Mark Ayers, president of the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department [2]:

Contrary to claims by those who oppose these agreements—who subscribe to a “race to the bottom” mentality, where success is predicated on the ability to assemble a low-wage, easily exploitable workforce—PLAs have proven over and over that they are a valuable, market-based tool that ensures superior jobsite management, project efficiencies, and workforce productivity and development.

 

Project labor agreements are pre-hire collective bargaining agreements that establish the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project.

Numerous cost-conscious and profit-oriented private corporations, such as Disney, Toyota, Southern Company, ENG Energy and Constellation Energy, have embraced the benefits of PLAs, Ayers said.

These companies, just like a growing number of state and local governments, utilize these agreements to not only ensure an “on-time, on-budget” return on their investments, but to also create career training opportunities for local citizens.

 

U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis says PLAs are a “win-win” situation.

They benefit businesses, workers and taxpayers. I’ve seen the track record in cities like Los Angeles—high-quality work on projects done on time, on budget and good job and training opportunities that strengthen our communities.

 

Source URL:
http://www.gsmlaborcouncil.org/node/5129

Labor Book Author Visits NSLC

Monday MArch 15, 6:30 - 8:30

Labor Council and community activists rally for healthcare reform

 Saturday, February 20, 2010 the activist community on the North Shore and Greater Boston decided to liven up the dormant debate over healthcare. Since the Democrats have been in power in Washington, there has been a lack of respect for the ideals and values of the people who elected them reflected in their rhetoric and debate. 

Local activists have taken to the streets to support them in their efforts to get something done and they have shone a lack of fortitude for the challenge. 

The people here locally have decided to remind them of the issue and try to strengthen their for pushing through. The accompanying video comes from a NECN feed.

Hey, Democrats, Remember Us?

President Crosby uses national stage to explain Mass election result.

Hart Research Associates break down the Special Election

 

On the evening of January 19, Hart Research Associates conducted a telephone

survey among 810 voters in the special election for U.S. Senate in

Massachusetts. The survey, conducted on behalf of the AFL-CIO, has a margin

of error of ±3.8 percentage points. Note that the survey data were weighted to

be consistent with the actual election results, yielding a five-point margin for

Brown (50% Brown, 45% Coakley, 1% other candidates, 4% refused). This

memo reviews the survey’s main findings.

In glitzy shadows, a health reform foe lurks

    In glitzy shadows, a health reform foe lurks Boston Globe On the same day thousands protested in Washington against health care legislation, their rich proprietor was toasted by Manhattan's fashionable socialites during the City Opera's opening night, where he was lauded for his support of the arts. Lee Fang December 6, 2009 --> Lee Fang

 

By Lee Fang   December 6, 2009    

IN EARLY November, thousands of protesters descended on Capitol Hill to hear Representative Michele Bachmann decry House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “takeover’’ of health care. As they disembarked from their buses, they were greeted with doughnuts and coffee, and handed protest signs and talking points about socialized medicine. Few of the protesters were aware that a right-wing billionaire had paid for the meals, buses, or salaries of the helpful guides. On the same day, this rich proprietor was toasted by Manhattan’s fashionable socialites during the City Opera’s opening night, where he was lauded for his support.

David Koch, an oil and gas billionaire who is the ninth-richest person in the United States, according to Forbes magazine, was simultaneously responsible for a $100 million refurbished opera house and a protest that featured signs comparing health reform to the Holocaust. The two sides to Koch’s activism aren’t unique - they harken to a long tradition of conservative tycoons who were great philanthropists with one hand and ruthless powerbrokers with the other. But Koch’s hidden presence in the health care debate illustrates the extent to which the Old Right is creating - and then hiding behind - the grassroots fervor of middle-class opponents of health reform.

Across the New York social circuit, Koch is hailed for his donations to reputable causes, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But for years, Koch has also been funneling tens of millions of dollars to more subterranean efforts that reflect his conservative politics. His flagship group, Americans for Prosperity, sponsored Bachmann’s rally against health care reform. Although the Lincoln Center’s State Theater is now called the David H. Koch Theater, none of Koch’s right-wing fronts bear his name.

Americans for Prosperity is leading the way in channeling recession-era distress into anger at President Obama. This “grassroots’’ group has orchestrated many of the tea party protests, as well as steering activists into disrupting town hall meetings of Democratic members of Congress. Americans for Prosperity’s tactics are not new. Just as Koch inherited his oil business from his father, Americans for Prosperity borrows from the ultra-right group also founded in part by his dad, the John Birch Society.

Conceived by Robert Welch and a small group of conservative industrialists, including Fred Koch - David’s father and the namesake of the family firm of Koch Industries - the John Birch Society cloaked its pro-business, anti-civil rights agenda in the rhetoric of the Cold War.

The Birch Society battled communism by labeling President Kennedy a traitor who had to be impeached, denounced taxes as a creeping red menace, and attacked the forces of racial integration as being directed by the Kremlin.

Cushioned with large donations from Koch and others, the Birch Society helped propel Barry Goldwater to the Republican nomination in 1964 and helped Republicans make gains in the congressional midterms of 1966.

Like Americans for Prosperity, the John Birch Society rarely acknowledged its funding from the very rich. Instead, it depicted itself as a citizens group merely interested in American ideals of freedom. Rather than argue the policy nuances of entitlement programs or new regulations, the Birch Society marshaled opposition by depicting progressive reform as capitulation to the Soviet Union. In that polarized environment, the interests of millionaires suddenly became aligned with patriotic families who wanted to do their part against the communist threat.

Shortly after the Birch Society faded, David Koch founded Americans for Prosperity in 1984 (then known as Citizens for a Sound Economy). Americans for Prosperity still portrays itself as a defender of freedom and the average Joe. On the Americans for Prosperity website, financial regulations, health reform, net neutrality, and the estate tax are all assailed as forms of socialism.

While David Koch is celebrated as a patron of New York opera, his Americans for Prosperity donations have gone largely unsung. With his millions, he will not only have saved this year’s performance of the “Nutcracker,’’ but also contributed greatly to the obstruction of universal health care, the denial of climate change, and the derailment of much of President Obama’s domestic agenda.

His dad would be pleased.

Lee Fang works for the Center for American Progress in Washington.

© Copyright 2009 Globe Newspaper Company.

Saugus slams door on Jin

Last modified: Wednesday, December 9, 2009 12:19 AM EST

 
 

 

SAUGUS - The Board of Selectmen hit Jin Asian Restaurant with a triple-whammy Tuesday when it voted twice to suspend its alcohol, entertainment and common victualers licenses and just as a precaution to roll back its hours of operations.

Jin officials, who were no-shows at the hearing, will shut its doors still owing the town $257,183.83 in back taxes.

The board held two show-cause hearings on the troubled Route 1 north restaurant, one for defaulting on its taxes and another tied to a variety of violations that include two shootings, failure to get the town's approval for renovations, making renovations while its license is suspended and serving alcohol while its all-alcohol license was suspended.

The Alcohol Beverage Control Commission suspended Jin's license on Nov. 25 because of administrative wrong doings. Ira Zaleznik, special council to the board, suggested the selectmen move ahead with the show-cause hearings despite the ABCC's actions, essentially a back up.

Zaleznik said the appeal period on the ABCC's revocation has not run its course yet so theoretically if Jin official's got the appeal overturned in court then walked into Town Hall with a large check all before Dec. 31 then it could reopen.

If that happened, Zaleznik said the town would be in the same position its in now.

Selectman Michael Serino agreed the board should vote to revoke despite the fact that the ABCC beat them to the punch.

"History shows that establishments have run to court and get suspensions overturned. They did it a few weeks ago," he said referring to the fact that Jin had another license suspension overturned in early November.

During the second hearing Zaleznik again urged board members to vote regardless of the early votes and the ABCC rulings.

"Again its the nature of a backup to the backup," he said. "Even though it seems improbable they could get the license and put themselves back in business."

Serino said he would also like to take a vote to roll back the restaurant's hours on the basis that if the improbable did happen and it got its licenses back in court, the judge might at least uphold the roll back.

Town Meeting member Janet Leuci said she would support any action the board could take on behalf of the little guy who struggles to pay his taxes while Jin neglects theirs. She said she believed the restaurant brought irreparable harm to the town's reputation.

Stephen Sweezey, also a Town Meeting member, pointed out that the $250,000 is a lot of money that instead of being used for town expenses is "going into the pockets of a company that doesn't play by the rules."

The board voted 3-0 twice to revoke Jin's entertainment, all-alcohol and common victualers license and to roll its hours of operations back to midnight permanently.

Chairman Donald Wong sat out the hearing do to a conflict of interest and Selectman Michael Kelleher had a previous engagement.

Coalition rallies at State House for jobs program

Women's Annual Breakfast video links

Syndicate content